THE MYSTICS OF ISLAM
by Reynold A. Nicholson
Routledge, Kegan Paul, London
[1914]
THE MYSTICS OF ISLAM
INTRODUCTION
THE title of this book sufficiently explains why it is included in a Series
'exemplifying
the adventures and labours of individual seekers or groups of seekers in quest
of reality.'
Sufism, the religious philosophy of Islam, is described in the oldest extant
definition as
'the apprehension of divine realities,' and Mohammedan mystics are fond of
calling
themselves Ahl al-Haqq, 'the followers of the Real.' {Al-Haqq is the term
generally used by Sufis when they refer to God.} In attempting to set forth
their central doctrines from this point of
view, I shall draw to some extent on materials which I have collected during the
last
twenty years for a general history of Islamic mysticism--a subject so vast and
many-sided
that several large volumes would be required to do it anything like justice.
Here I can
only sketch in broad outline certain principles, methods, and characteristic
features of the
inner life as it has been lived by Moslems of every class and condition from the
eighth
century of our era to the present day. Difficult are the paths which they
threaded, dark
and bewildering the pathless heights beyond; but even if we may not hope to
accompany
the travelers to their journey's end, any information that we have gathered
concerning
their religious environment and spiritual history will help us to understand the
strange
experiences of which they write.
In the first place, therefore, I propose to offer a few remarks on the origin
and historical
development of Sufism, its relation to Islam, and its general character. Not
only are these
matters interesting to the student of comparative religion; some knowledge of
them is
indispensable to any serious student of Sufism itself. It may be said, truly
enough, that all
mystical experiences ultimately meet in a single point; but that point assumes
widely
different aspects according to the mystic's religion, race, and temperament,
while the
converging lines of approach admit of almost infinite variety. Though all the
great types
of mysticism have something in common, each is marked by peculiar
characteristics
resulting from the circumstances in which it arose and flourished. Just as the
Christian
type cannot be understood without reference to Christianity, so the Mohammedan
type
must be viewed in connexion with the outward and inward development of Islam.
The word 'mystic,' which has passed from Greek religion into European
literature, is
represented in Arabic, Persian, and Turkish, the three chief languages of Islam,
by 'Sufi.'
The terms, however, are not precisely synonymous, for 'Sufi' has a specific
religious
connotation, and is restricted by usage to those mystics who profess the
Mohammedan
faith. And the Arabic word, although in course of time it appropriated the high
significance of the Greek--lips sealed by holy mysteries, eyes closed in
visionary rapture-
-bore a humbler meaning when it first gained currency (about 800 A.D.). Until
recently
its derivation was in dispute. Most Sufis, flying in the face of etymology, have
derived it
from an Arabic root which conveys the notion of 'purity'; this would make 'Sufi'
mean
'one who is pure in heart' or 'one of the elect.' Some European scholars
identified it with
«sophós» in the sense of 'theosophist.' But Nöldeke, in an article written
twenty years
ago, showed conclusively that the name was derived from suf (wool), and was
originally
applied to those Moslem ascetics who, in imitation of Christian hermits, clad
themselves
in coarse woollen garb as a sign of penitence and renunciation of worldly
vanities.
The earliest Sufis were, in fact, ascetics and quietists rather than mystics. An
overwhelming consciousness of sin, combined with a dread--which it is hard for
us to
realize--of Judgment Day and the torments of Hell-fire, so vividly painted in
the Koran,
drove them to seek salvation in flight from the world. On the other hand, the
Koran
warned them that salvation depended entirely on the inscrutable will of Allah,
who guides
aright the good and leads astray the wicked. Their fate was inscribed on the
eternal tables
of His providence, nothing could alter it. Only this was sure, that if they were
destined to
be saved by fasting and praying and pious works--then they would be saved. Such
a
belief ends naturally in quietism, complete and unquestioning submission to the
divine
will, an attitude characteristic of Sufism in its oldest form. The mainspring of
Moslem
religious life during the eighth century was fear--fear of God, fear of Hell,
fear of death,
fear of sin--but the opposite motive had already begun to make its influence
felt, and
produced in the saintly woman Rabi‘a at least one conspicuous example of truly
mystical
self-abandonment.
* * *
So far, there was no great difference between the Sufi and the orthodox
Mohammedan
zealot, except that the Sufis attached extraordinary importance to certain
Koranic
doctrines, and developed them at the expense of others which many Moslems might
consider equally essential. It must also be allowed that the ascetic movement
was inspired
by Christian ideals, and contrasted sharply with the active and pleasure-loving
spirit of
Islam. In a famous sentence the Prophet denounced monkish austerities and bade
his
people devote themselves to the holy war against unbelievers; and he gave, as is
well
known, the most convincing testimony in favour of marriage. Although his
condemnation
of celibacy did not remain without effect, the conquest of Persia, Syria, and
Egypt by his
successors brought the Moslems into contact with ideas which profoundly modified
their
outlook on life and religion. European readers of the Koran cannot fail to be
struck by its
author's vacillation and inconsistency in dealing with the greatest problems. He
himself
was not aware of these contradictions, nor were they a stumbling-block to his
devout
followers, whose simple faith accepted the Koran as the Word of God. But the
rift was
there, and soon produced far-reaching results.
Hence arose the Murjites, who set faith above works and emphasized the divine
love and
goodness; the Qadarites who affirmed, and the Jabarites who denied, that men are
responsible for their actions; the Mu‘tazilites, who built a theology on the
basis of reason,
rejecting the qualities of Allah as incompatible with His unity, and
predestinarianism as
contrary to His justice; and finally the Ash‘arites, the scholastic theologians
of Islam,
who formulated the rigid metaphysical and doctrinal system that underlies the
creed of
orthodox Mohammedans at the present time. All these speculations, influenced as
they
were by Greek theology and philosophy, reacted powerfully upon Sufism. Early in
the
third century of the Hegira--the ninth after Christ--we find manifest signs of
the new
leaven stirring within it. Not that Sufis ceased to mortify the flesh and take
pride in their
poverty, but they now began to regard asceticism as only the first stage of a
long journey,
the preliminary training for a larger spiritual life than the mere ascetic is
able to conceive.
The nature of the change may be illustrated by quoting a few sentences which
have come
down to us from the mystics of this period.
"Love is not to be learned from men: it is one of God's gifts and comes of
His grace."
"None refrains from the lusts of this world save him in whose heart there
is a light that keeps him always busied with the next world."
"When the gnostic's spiritual eye is opened, his bodily eye is shut: he sees
nothing but God."
"If gnosis were to take visible shape all who looked thereon would die at
the sight of its beauty and loveliness and goodness and grace, and every
brightness would become dark beside the splendour thereof." {Compare
Plato, Phædrus (Jowett's translation): "For sight is the keenest of our bodily
senses;
though not by that is wisdom seen; her loveliness would have been transporting
if there
had been a visible image of her."}
"Gnosis is nearer to silence than to speech."
"When the heart weeps because it has lost, the spirit laughs because it has
found."
"Nothing sees God and dies, even as nothing sees God and lives, because
His life is everlasting: whoever sees it is thereby made everlasting."
"O God, I never listen to the cry of animals or to the quivering of trees or
to the murmuring of water or to the warbling of birds or to the rustling
wind or to the crashing thunder without feeling them to be an evidence of
Thy unity and a proof that there is nothing like unto Thee."
* * *
"O my God, I invoke Thee in public as lords are invoked, but in private as
loved ones are invoked. Publicly I say, 'O my God!' but privately I say, 'O
my Beloved!'"
These ideas--Light, Knowledge, and Love--form, as it were, the keynotes of the
new
Sufism, and in the following chapters I shall endeavour to show how they were
developed. Ultimately they rest upon a pantheistic faith which deposed the One
transcendent God of Islam and worshipped in His stead One Real Being who dwells
and
works everywhere, and whose throne is not less, but more, in the human heart
than in the
heaven of heavens. Before going further, it will be convenient to answer a
question which
the reader may have asked himself--Whence did the Moslems of the ninth century
derive
this doctrine?
Modern research has proved that the origin of Sufism cannot be traced back to a
single
definite cause, and has thereby discredited the sweeping generalizations which
represent
it, for instance, as a reaction of the Aryan mind against a conquering Semitic
religion, and
as the product, essentially, of Indian or Persian thought. Statements of this
kind, even
when they are partially true, ignore the principle that in order to establish an
historical
connexion between A and B, it is not enough to bring forward evidence of their
likeness
to one another, without showing at the same time (1) that the actual relation of
B to A
was such as to render the assumed filiation possible, and (2) that the possible
hypothesis
fits in with all the ascertained and relevant facts. Now, the theories which I
have
mentioned do not satisfy these conditions. If Sufism was nothing but a revolt of
the
Aryan spirit, how are we to explain the undoubted fact that some of the leading
pioneers
of Mohammedan mysticism were natives of Syria and Egypt, and Arabs by race?
Similarly, the advocates of a Buddhistic or Vedantic origin forget that the main
current of
Indian influence upon Islamic civilization belongs to a later epoch, whereas
Moslem
theology, philosophy, and science put forth their first luxuriant shoots on a
soil that was
saturated with Hellenistic culture. The truth is that Sufism is a complex thing,
and
therefore no simple answer can be given to the question how it originated. We
shall have
gone far, however, towards answering that question when we have distinguished
the
various movements and forces which moulded Sufism, and determined what direction
it
should take in the early stages of its growth.
Let us first consider the most important external, i.e. non-Islamic, influences.
continue to the complete text of
The Mystics of Islam
The Spirit and Flesh World Religion and Spirituality Online Library: uniting seemingly opposed ideologies and vibrations into the true, pristine harmony of cosmic oneness.
online books: read
these books online

The Spirit and Flesh World Religion and Spirituality Online Library: uniting seemingly opposed ideologies and vibrations into the true, pristine harmony of cosmic oneness.
online books: read
these books online